Two texts, one question
Paired commentary, interview and forum writing on home office, AI in school and housing — read side by side.
At B1 you read a text. At B2 you read two, and the interesting question is no longer what each one says but where they actually disagree — which is usually narrower than it looks.
Two writers almost never disagree about everything. Find the fact they share first; the argument is about what follows from it.
Four things to look for while reading an argumentative text:
Die Zahl ist von achtzig auf vierzig Prozent gefallen.
evidence — checkable, and both sides can cite it
Das halte ich für zu optimistisch.
opinion — marked as the writer’s own judgement
ich halte … für, meiner Ansicht nach, vermutlich
Zwar teile ich die Kritik, aber daraus folgt nicht, dass …
a concession before the real point
zwar … aber concedes, then overrides
Das ist keine Drohung, sondern beobachtet worden.
the writer defending against an objection they expect
Tone is worth naming too. A text can be sachlich (matter-of-fact), skeptisch, zustimmend, ironisch or gereizt — and a writer who is annoyed will still make a fair point, so tone and argument have to be judged separately.
Deciding which writer is right, then answering the questions from that.Answering each question from the text it is about.
Comparative reading measures whether you followed both arguments — not which one you found more convincing.
Words from this topic
- die die Haltungthe stance, the attitude
- der der Einwandthe objection
- sachlichmatter-of-fact, objective
- einräumento concede, to admit
- der der Belegthe piece of evidence
- widersprechento contradict
- überzeugento convince